Info seputar HK Prize 2020 – 2021.
The very first person charged as well as attempted under Hong Kong’s draconian nationwide security law has been found guilty of terrorism and also prompting secession, in a spots ruling that establishes a precedent for future situations brought under the law.Tong Ying-kit
, 24, a former waiter, had begged not guilty to the charges, which additionally consisted of hazardous driving causing grievous physical harm. He deals with possible prison terms varying from several years to life, as well as his lawyers are expected to say for a lighter penalty at his sentencing hearing on Thursday.The instance associated with
a case that happened on 1 July 2020, less than 24 hr after the safety and security law was enacted, as thousands of Hong Kongers took to the streets in demonstration as well as were consulted with a heavy cops response.Tong was condemned of terrorism for crashing his motorcycle right into three trouble authorities, and also of prompting secessionism for lugging a flag on the motorbike with the protest slogan” Liberate Hong Kong, revolution of our times”, which prosecutors stated was separatist.Reading the verdict, Justice Esther Toh stated Tong “devoted terrorist tasks triggering or planned to cause serious injury to the society”in search of a political agenda. His behavior was an act of violence focused on persuading the main and also Hong Kong governments and also daunting the general public, Toh stated. Since the prosecution was certain that it had actually shown “each and every aspect” of the terrorism as well as secession fees, it made a decision not to proceed with the dangerous driving charge.Tong’s defence lawyer has stated it was impossible to verify that Tong was inciting secession simply by having used the motto. The protection also said there was no evidence Tong committed the act intentionally, that he stayed clear of collapsing right into police officers and that his actions might not be thought about terrorism given that there was no significant physical violence or injury to society.The decision was quickly condemned by Amnesty International, which called it”the beginning of completion for civil liberty in Hong Kong “.” People should be complimentary to utilize political slogans throughout objections, and also Tong Ying-kit must not be punished for exercising his right to complimentary speech,”Amnesty’s Asia-Pacific local director, Yamini Mishra, stated.
“It is specifically clear that he needs to never ever have actually been billed with a nationwide safety offense bring a possible life sentence.” Imposed by Beijing with the blessing of the city’s management, the national security law punishes what China sees as subversion, secession, terrorism and collusion with international pressures. It has been criticised as extremely broad as well as criminalising benign acts of dissent, and also authorities have actually been accused of using it to crush opposition.At the very least 128 individuals have actually been arrested under the legislation, and over half billed– a considerable variety of them for alleged secessionist speech, including making use of the “Free”slogan.As well as making apprehensions, authorities have actually targeted opposition politicians as well as protestors, media outlets and also staff members, churches, colleges, and also unions, for supposed national protection breaches.Much of the test was invested in debates over the definition of the “Free Hong Kong “motto, which was common during mass protests in 2019. The support had competed the slogan indicated various things to various people, and also there was no person commonly recognized meaning at the time Tong flew the flag.In founding guilty Tong, a panel of 3 courts discovered the slogan was”capable”of being secessionist, and Tong had actually purposely incited separatism by presenting the slogan. Tong’s test was presided over by courts chosen by the city leader, Carrie Lam, to specifically listen to national protection situations. Tong’s case is seen by pro-democracy protestors as well as human rights groups as a departure from Hong Kong’s usual law traditions, as he was rejected bond as well as a jury test– the last for the first time in the court’s 176-year history.In Tuesday’s judgment, the courts stated lawful concepts including the right to a reasonable trial, the presumption of innocence, and also the problem of evidence used in the event as much as any other.The governments in Beijing and also Hong Kong have claimed consistently the protection regulation was essential to bring stability after the often-violent 2019 protests and
that the civil liberties and flexibilities promised to the city upon its return to Chinese regulation in 1997 stay undamaged.